Tuesday, October 14, 2008

United Kirat Organisation of America welcome exiled Bhutanese in America


United Kirat Rai Organization of America President Shivakumar Rai welcoming Bhutanese Nepalese refugees at the Manchester International Airport, New Hampshire, USA.


Shivakumar Rai , Central President of United Kirat Rai Organization of America and Lutheran Social Service with Bhutanese Nepalese refugees at the Manchester International Airport, New Hampshire, USA

Photos contributed by United Kirat Rai Organization of America.

United Kirat Organisation of America welcome exiled Bhutanese in America


United Kirat Rai Organization of America President Shivakumar Rai welcoming Bhutanese Nepalese refugees at the Manchester International Airport, New Hampshire, USA.


Shivakumar Rai , Central President of United Kirat Rai Organization of America and Lutheran Social Service with Bhutanese Nepalese refugees at the Manchester International Airport, New Hampshire, USA

Photos contributed by United Kirat Rai Organization of America.

Nepal sends Bhutanese refugees to third country for resettlement

More than 420 Bhutanese refugees living in UN-run camps in eastern Nepal have been resettled in another country as part of a third-country resettlement programme, a media report said Sunday. A total of 422 refugees were sent to the US, New Zealand, Canada and other countries since the programme began earlier this year, Annapurna Post reported.

Nepalese security officials quoted the International Organisation for Migration as saying the process was continuing and another batch of 19 refugees were to leave Nepal for a third-country settlement this week, the newspaper said.

More than 107,000 Bhutanese refugees, mainly of Nepali origin, are housed in seven refugee camps in Jhapa and Mornag district in eastern Nepal.

The refugees began arriving in Nepal in the early 1990s alleging the Bhutanese government of persecution on the basis of their religion, culture and language. Several rounds of high level talks between Nepal and Bhutan failed to resolve the deadlock.

The US has said it could eventually resettle over 60,000 refugees. Some other countries including Norway, New Zealand and Canada have also said they will resettle the refugees but have not made public the numbers they are willing to take in.

Bhutan in the past has insisted that the refugees in the UN run camps in eastern Nepal are not Bhutanese nationals despite most refugees possessing Bhutanese government identification documents.

Officials say they have received applications from over 30,000 refugees so far for the settlement programmes and the number was expected to rise.

The resettlement programme has been opposed to refugee groups who favour repatriation back to Bhutan as the only solution, which has led to rising tension in the refugee camps.

Last year, the Nepalese government clamped a curfew in the refugee camps after tensions escalated between rival refugee groups over the resettlement process.
DPA

Bhutan refugees bid tearful farewell to Nepal

Twenty Bhutanese refugees, including a one-year-old child, Monday bid a tearful farewell to Nepal and the hope of ever being able to return home, as they headed for the US to start a new life after languishing for 17 years in closed camps. Three refugee families with 20 members, who had flown along with 43 more peers from their shanties in Sanischare camp in eastern Nepal, sobbed and looked glum as they went inside Kathmandu’s Tribhuvan International Airport to fly out to start life afresh in the US.

“We don’t know what we are going to do,” said Manorath Koirala, the head of a family of 10 members.

“We have not even been told where we are going. We have been given no documents except for one that identifies us as refugees.”

Lack of transparency and secrecy shrouded the resettlement process with the International Organisation for Migration, chosen to facilitate the exodus, remaining evasive and herding the refugees into the airport to prevent interaction with awaiting journalists.

Over 30,000 of the nearly 108,000 people living in two eastern districts of Nepal under the supervision of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) have applied for third-country settlement after the US last year spearheaded a drive by western countries to offer a new home to them and Nepal finally agreed to allow them go instead of pushing for repatriation.

“We lived in the camp for 17 years,” said a bleak Koirala. “Bhutan refused to take us back and Nepal refused to let us become citizens. India furthermore prevented us from returning home.”

“We are now forced to leave so that our children might have a better future.”

The exodus starts ironically as Bhutan goes to its first general election March 24 in a purported bid by its royal family to democratise the isolated Himalayan kingdom and begin handing over power to an elected government.

The refugee drama started in the 1980s when Bhutan began cracking down on citizens of Nepali origin.

The evicted Lhotsampas, as they were called, first fled to India across the border, from where thousands proceeded to Nepal.

Though Bhutan held over 15 rounds of repatriation talks with Nepal due to mounting international pressure, it broke off dialogue under a pretext and has not allowed a single refugee to return.

On the contrary, its ministers have gone on record as saying that Maoists pervade the refugee camps and to allow the refugees back would be tantamount to importing terrorism.

Though Nepal and the international community urged India, Bhutan’s biggest donor and trade partner, to persuade the Druk government, New Delhi has refused to do so, saying the issue was a bilateral matter between Bhutan and Nepal.

The third country resettlement offer gave rise to mounting tension in the camps and violence as those desiring to return home clashed with those willing to go abroad.

Earlier this month, there was a devastating fire in one of the camps, rendering over 9,000 people homeless and adding to the urgency of the need to find a durable solution to the refugee issue.

On Wednesday, the remaining 43 refugees who came from east Nepal would flow to New Zealand.

Testimony from Bhutanese refugee living in exile

Following the screening carried out in 2001 in Khudunabari, one of seven Bhutanese refugee camps in Nepal, the Royal Government of Bhutan declared in July 2003 that over 75% of those screened were either Bhutanese citizens, or Bhutanese citizens who had relinquished their nationality under Bhutanese citizenship law by migrating voluntarily. All were eligible to return to Bhutan, on terms set out by the Royal Government of Bhutan. It seemed possible that a resolution of the problem might be based on the right to a nationality and the right to leave and return to one’s country.

The bilateral process between Nepal and Bhutan appeared to collapse after the withdrawal of the Bhutanese verification team from Khudunabari camp in December 2003.

Apparently putting aside Bhutan’s July 2003 commitment, King Jigme Singye Wangchuk was reported at a press conference in New Delhi in January 2005 as saying that the people in the refugee camps were not Bhutanese citizens, and could have been living in India or Nepal previously. He spoke as if the screening at Khudunabari camp had never happened.

In the absence of any progress towards a resolution of the issue, the US government offered in 2006 to resettle some 60,000 Bhutanese refugees. The resettlement process began in early 2008. By May 31, 2008, 828 refugees had been settled: 673 in the US, and smaller numbers in Australia, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Norway. The process is being managed by the International Organisation for Migrations (IOM).

While many refugees welcome the prospect of third country resettlement after up to seventeen years of living in camps, others strongly oppose it, and the disagreement is causing serious tensions. The opponents of resettlement see it as eroding their right to return to their country.

Both the political parties running in Bhutan’s National Assembly election held on March 24 declared in their manifesto that they would work for a resolution of the problem of "the people in the camps". However, thousands of Bhutanese people of Nepalese origin (Lhotshampas) still living in Bhutan were, reportedly, denied the right to vote in the election. During the election campaign, candidates were barred from speaking about matters of citizenship and security, issues which are crucial to Lhotshampas living in Bhutan and to refugees seeking to return to Bhutan.

Bhutan’s new government has taken office under Prime Minister Jigmi Thinley, whose party, the Druk Phuensum Tshogpa, won seats in 45 out of the country’s 47 constituencies. The new government has not yet spoken about the question of the “people in the camps.”

Testimonies: Refugees

* Testimony from a teacher who worked in the south of Bhutan
* All names in testimonies have been changed

Since the first refugees fled from persecution in Bhutan in the early 1990s, their stories have been recorded by international and local human rights organisations.

Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, The Refugee Council and the Association of Human Rights Activists, Bhutan (AHURA) have recorded accounts that detail widespread human rights abuses by the Bhutanese government of the Lhotshampa in what appears to be a bid to drive them out of their homes.

Below are some of their testimonies.

* Indra
* Kazi
* Buddhi
* A teacher from Thimpu
* A 17-year-old pro-democracy demonstrator
* A village headman
* A Southern Bhutanese farmer
* A girl, aged 12 when she left Bhutan
* A 50-year-old refugee woman


Indra

"It was on Monday. All the family members were ready for dinner after finishing a hard day’s work. At that time we heard an unusual sound outside. My father went to outside the kitchen and was suddenly caught around the neck by a policeman who started to beat him.

After some time the policeman tied his hands and started walking towards the van. All of my family were weeping and begged them to let go of my father. But the policeman denied our requests and took our father to prison.

In prison they hung my father upside down and beat him. Then they hung him over chilli smoke. After that they ordered him to leave the country with all his family.

That very night myself and my family left our house and our country empty handed. There were many tears.

During the night we had to cross a big forest. We small children were crying for lack of food. Without light to see, we had to cross a big river. Only in the morning did we reach India.

With only sorrows we started the long journey from India to Nepal. We children were still asking for food but our father was only able to give us water.

Eventually we arrived at Maidhar, Nepal – near the bank of the Mai river. We still had nothing to eat. We went to a Nepalese village but the people chased us away. After that the Nepal government provided us with rice."

Kazi

"It was July 3rd 1990 at about 4 o’clock in the evening. Suddenly my father cried with fright and pain. I, too, was frightened at that moment but my fear reached the boundary of my mind when I saw blood running from my father’s thigh.

He tells me now that after I fell unconscious, he held me, embracing me with his arms, and then tried to run away. However, he was injured and was unable to run or walk far and he was soon arrested by the army forces.

I do not remember anything after I fell unconscious. My step-mother was also there and she was also arrested. In jail they were kept separately and my father was tortured.

One day we were returning from the market. An incident occurred and my father told me this story, his eyes full of tears. He said, ‘I still have no idea about my wife, whether she is dead or alive’."

Buddhi

"The village in Bhutan where I spent my childhood and our forefathers spent the whole of their lives has a Dzong to the northern side, a monastery to the east and snow-clad mountains to the far side. Our Hindu temple was on the southern side of our house and was burnt before our eyes in 1989. We were told to worship Lord Buddha in their monasteries.

A spy who was a neighbour led the Bhutanese army to our house and they arrested my father. He was taken to prison and ordered to eat the meat of cows and do Buddhist religious ceremonies.

He was told to stop praying to Hindu gods and goddesses and to always wear the national dress. If we did not do this we had to leave the country. My father did not obey and they kept him in prison for six months were he was severely punished.

When they freed my father they burned our house in front of his eyes. No human likes to see their home burn and we cried but no one was there to help us. Our cries were in vain. So we left our animals, our burnt house and everything else and fled towards Jhapa in Eastern Nepal for safety."

A teacher from Thimpu

There was a pro-government rally in my area, but I did not attend so I was fired from my job. I was afraid to go home to southern Bhutan because all educated people were being arrested. But without my job, I had to leave.

I was arrested in July 1992. I was tied up and beaten by police all day. My mother came to the police station and appealed for me. They said they would release me if I signed a statement (Voluntary Migration Certificate). I signed in order to escape from prison. Then I had to flee.

A 17-year-old pro-democracy demonstrator

Around midnight on 1 January 1991 we were awoken by a group of about 30 Bhutanese security personnel … My father, brother and I were arrested and taken to Sarbhang police station… In Sarbhang we were housed in the school. Food was always insufficient and of very poor quality. We were regularly tortured.

In March 1992, along with some other inmates, I was transferred to Chamgang prison near Thimphu. Here too we were regularly tortured. They would hang us by our wrists for prolonged periods from the ceiling or upside down… Till the Red Cross team visited the prison in 1993, we were continuously kept in shackles. Beating was also very severe, with 200-300 lashes per day being common.

From the time of our arrest, none of us was allowed to meet our relatives. We later found out they were never informed of our place of detention.

A village headman
(from Nowhere to turn: Bhutanese refugees in Nepal, The Refugee Council, UK (1998))

When they introduced registration they told me (as a village headman) to tell the people to leave the country. When I protested they beat me and put me in prison. A headman from another district was beaten to death in front of me. Local courts issued orders directing people to leave. Soldiers stole cattle and harassed women.

Out of 445 houses in my area, 440 households were driven out. I spent seven months in jail and another four months in Thimphu prison. They took me to the border with 40 rupees and left me there.


A Southern Bhutanese farmer
(from Bhutan: A Shangri-La without Human Rights, various Bhutanese organisations in exile, 2000)

On the fifth day, the soldiers came to the prison cell and began intimidating me to write the application. Exhausted, I was unable to bear any more torture and I wrote down the application. Soon after that I was released.

After seven days a group of police came to my house to summon me to the district office. There they had the Voluntary Migration Form filled and forced me to sign the document, the content of which I did not understand. Out of sheer fear I signed it.

They gave me a very small amount of money. While receiving the money, I was asked to smile and say that I was leaving the country of my own free will, facing a video camera. When I refused, the policemen beat me hard on my back. Out of extreme fear, I complied with the order, while the officials watched the scene mockingly. I was ordered to leave the country within five days.


A girl, aged 12 when she left Bhutan
(from Nowhere to turn: Bhutanese refugees in Nepal, The Refugee Council, UK (1998))

From Sarbhang we took a truck to Maidhar, where there was nothing. It was windy and not good there. Soon after reaching, it became very congested with many people and many died. I think people died from the congestion. We stayed in Maidhar for about three months. We built a shelter there from sticks. We got some green plastic from an NGO.

A 50-year-old refugee woman
(from Nowhere to turn: Bhutanese refugees in Nepal, The Refugee Council, UK (1998))


I was tortured by Bhutanese police when I refused to go and work for them. I was classified F4 in the census so then they threw me out of the country. I still take medicine for the torture they inflicted on me. Despite everything I want to go home but only if we go in a group. At least let me die in my own house.

What can a refugee do?


Remember that:
* any Bhutanese refugees returning to Bhutan must do so with full citizenship rights and human rights protections.
* wherever in the world Bhutanese refugees may be resettled, they do not forfeit their right to return to their own country when the human rights situation in Bhutan improves.
* Bhutanese refugees settled in other countries should be able to communicate with their relatives and friends in Bhutan without fear that their loved ones may suffer.
* Lhotshampas who have stayed in Bhutan through the troubled times remain a vulnerable group, and their King and Government must ensure that they enjoy full citizenship rights and human rights protections.
* Bhutan is signatory to the United Nations Convention on all forms of Discrimination against Women and and Convention on the Rights of the Child, and has undertaken to uphold all the provisions of these two conventions.


Call on your government, working through UN agencies, through regional associations (for example the European Union or the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation), or in its bilateral dealings with Bhutan,

* to urge the Royal Government of Bhutan to make the benefits of development aid accessible to all Bhutanese people equally, regardless of their ethnic group.
* to urge the Royal Government of Bhutan to carry out its full responsibilities under the human rights instruments to which it is committed.

Inform yourself if you are travelling to Bhutan for vacation or work, by learning more about the human rights situation in the country.

Challenge others to look more seriously at the grave human rights abuses which are often glossed over in the portrayal of Bhutan as a “Shangri-la.”